Talk:Geist (video game)/GA1

GA Reassessment

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
As an article on the Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force/Sweeps list, I am reviewing this article. And from the looks of its current state, it doesn't look like GA material. Here's why:

There's no references in some sections in the article.
Some pictures seem unnessessary.
And the Prose is bad.

So, 7 days or its delisted. GamerPro64 (talk) 23:03, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Support - it looks like a C-class to me. It needs citations for the storyline/characters (which also need to be trimmed). The Enemies section is game guide content.--_{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 19:51, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You know, you could try to work on this article to let it keep its GA title. GamerPro64 (talk) 20:00, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, yes, he could, but not everyone has time to do so. That's an irritating question to pose someone - if someone suggested this to me, I'd point out Redpill, Travis Touchdown, Midna, GLaDOS, etc. that I'm already too busy to work on this. - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 20:53, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Support - Enemies section is unnecessary, and it lacks the quality one would expect of a GA. Also, I'm no fan of Characters list when it's all just repeating plot information. - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 20:54, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the times up and with no changes, and with two editors supporting the delist, Geist will be be delisted. GamerPro64 (talk) 04:01, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]