Jump to content

Talk:Geitodoris heathi

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The problem with this species is that, according to http://seaslugforum.net/ it is in genus Geitodoris, while according to http://www.marinespecies.org/ it belongs in Discodoris. Since Geitodoris has been moved out of the Discodorididae in accordance with WoRMS, perhaps heathi should be moved to Discodoris also in accordance with WoRMS? I am inclined to go with WoRMS because the basis for their record is http://www.itis.gov, which in turn bases its record on: Turgeon, D. D., A. E. Bogan, E. V. Coan, W. K. Emerson, W. G. Lyons, W. Pratt, et al. (1988) Common and scientific names of aquatic invertebrates from the United States and Canada: mollusks American Fisheries Society Special Publication 16 ISBN 0-913235-47-4, 0097-0638.

I await Project Gastropod's verdict!

Seascapeza (talk) 12:05, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Geitodoris heathi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:05, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]