Jump to content

Talk:Geoffrey A. Landis/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Pyrotec (talk) 18:04, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewing. Pyrotec (talk) 18:04, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Initial comments

[edit]
Having review this article in some depth, its a good article.
I found only two "holds" that prevent me from awarding GA-status on the article as it stands:
  • The infobox has a drop down "Influences" section that is normally hidden. There are a number of names of people stated to have influenced Geoffrey A. Landis, but its unreferenced and therefore not WP:Verifiable.
  • That list includes John Varley - which happens to be a disambig page contain three people.

I'm putting the review On Hold for these (minor) points to be addressed. Pyrotec (talk) 18:56, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review, Pyrotec. I have referenced the influences and fixed the Varley diambig. it is a pleasure to see this article get this far, as it was prodded on March 2. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 21:29, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. Pyrotec (talk) 08:09, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Overall summary

[edit]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:

Congratulations on avoiding the prod and for reaching GA-standard. Pyrotec (talk) 08:09, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]