From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- I disagree. Engineering is about the design and construction of things, and the various sites I looked at are all basically about the use of geophysics as a way of obtaining data. There's no design element involved. The article is one sentence long, and doesn't say anything which would be of use to anyone, or I'd consider renaming the article to Applied geophysics, which is a real specialty. Argyriou (talk) 22:39, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
- I suspect a case of engineering inflation, which is a little odd, since geophysics is harder than geotechnical engineering. But anyway, the article is one sentence long, and hasn't had a substantive edit since it was created in November 2006. I'm going to take this one to AfD.
- I wish I knew a geophysicist I could recruit to Wikipedia, because all the articles on geophysics here are crap. Argyriou (talk) 15:58, 31 July 2007 (UTC)