Talk:Gesundheit! Institute

Untitled

How is the neutrality disputed since the article includes the word 'perceived'? Rlloyd3 01:38, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

Changed "percieved" to "what the Institute sees as". Is that a bit more NPOV? Squirrel Killer 20:48, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

the page doesn't really say what they do.

I added a brief summary of care model taken from the 'Patch Adams' page. DFS (talk) 21:22, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Where is the Gesundheit hospital

Patch Adams has been raising money for 40 years to build a hospital in Pocahontas County, WV. THERE IS NO GESUNDHEIT HOSPITAL. Ask any local resident. Meanwhile, our only real hospital, Pocahontas Memorial continues to struggle to keep its doors open. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MM McLaughlin (talk • contribs) 00:05, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

Contested deletion

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... (your reason here) --98.245.84.50 (talk) 03:58, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

The article states 'The Institute states its vision as being dedicated to revolutionizing health care delivery by replacing what the Institute sees as greed and competition with generosity and compassion.'

The article is claiming that it is important to reform the current health care model. It is silly to assert that the health care model is sustainable and optimized, and this article is important because it identifies an alternative model, thus helping develop dialogue about how to approach the health care system.

Eliot Kersgaard, elke9384@colorado.edu

Significance

The Institute appears to be a real facility, labeled by Google Maps, near where the geo coordinates point. This article is about the Institute; not the proposed hospital. The Institute appears to be credible that is it really exists. Its claims to significance appear to be that it was directly connected with a notable movie, it seeks to integrate alternative healing methods, and it has and apparently continues to have an international humanitarian clowning program. The article is certainly in need of critical and updated work but that doesn't appear to be an A7 justification.
SBaker43 (talk) 06:36, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Gesundheit! Institute. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20130911023639/http://patchadams.org:80/board to http://patchadams.org/board

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 23:50, 12 January 2016 (UTC)