Talk:Gettysburg (The Office)/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: TBrandley (talk · contribs) 17:34, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
Issues and suggestions | |||
---|---|---|---|
# | Where? | Issue | Per |
1 | Infobox | Where are guest stars referenced? | WP:SOURCE, WP:WIAGA |
2 | Infobox | Add The Office US season 8 link to episode lists, something | — |
3 | Lede | Link comedy to television comedy instead | WP:OVERLINK |
4 | Lede | Same goes for television series, as issue 3 | WP:OVERLINK |
5 | Lede | NBC should be the National Broadcasting Company (NBC) for its first mention | MOS:ACRO |
6 | Lede | In the episode, to "In this episode" | — |
7 | Lede | Nielsen Media Research should be Nielsen ratings | — |
8 | Production | "The A.V. Club reviewer Myles McNutt applauded the writers' use of Andy's "overeager qualities" to have the office group skip the official tour, allowing "some random California heritage site" to stand in for the real Gettysburg" that seems to be about episode themes, not production | — |
9 | Production | "The Official website for The Office" The Office should be in italics please | WP:MOS |
10 | Production | % should be percent please | Copy-edits |
11 | Reception | What channel did it air on? Not mentioned here at all. | WP:LEDE, etc. |
12 | Reception | ABC should be American Broadcasting Company (ABC) in its first mention here | MOS:ACRO |
13 | Reception | Use regular quotation marks, rather than curly, as seen in "didn’t" in reception | WP:MOS |
14 | Reception | "mostly" to "generally" | — |
15 | Reception | "cold opening" remove cold | WP:NPOV |
16 | References | Don't shout at me lol | Sourcing |
17 | References | Use single quotes in reference titles, rather than double | WP:MOS |
18 | References | WP:DASH problems | WP:DASH |
19 | External links | Categories should be sorted in alphabetical order please | Guidelines |
Sorry for the wait. I suddenly went on a Wikibreak. Oh well, that's all. Cheers, TBrandley 01:35, 17 September 2012 (UTC) |
No worries about the break! I got all of the issues fixed. The only one I didn't was #1: the guest stars are referenced to the episode, and since this is an article about the episode, it seems rather redundant to cite the episode for the article about the episode. Thanks for the review.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 01:47, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks! Looks good now; passing. Well done! TBrandley 01:57, 17 September 2012 (UTC)