Talk:Global Reporting Initiative
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Hello editors. This is just a short note to say that I will be updating some of the information on this page this week to help keep it in line with the Wikipedia guidelines, and to ensure it is up to date regarding the organisation's work. I look forward to your feedback on the updates! Sarahbilly (talk) 14:11, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
This article is largely positive towards GRI. It would be interesting to hear some other views. - Joel
Comments
[edit]I agree with Joel -- this article doesn't seem to adhere to Wikipedia's neutrality standards. The grammar could also use improvement. - Chris
Certainly seems surreptitious advertising . I believe should be revised or principal editor should argue something. Yes Chris this article doesn't seem to adhere to Wikipedia's neutrality standards.- Marc
Remarks
[edit]This article needs substantial revision. As of now it reads as adversarial, promotional and has numerous issues. For instance, significant information has been omitted (stats, alliances, progression, impact, etc.). It's also outdated and the lexicon is unclear. Verbal.noun (talk) 09:39, 5 May 2015 (UTC)