Talk:Go D.J.

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

Hip hop Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hip hop, a collaborative effort to build a useful resource for and improve the coverage of hip hop on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Hip hopWikipedia:WikiProject Hip hopTemplate:WikiProject Hip hopHip hop articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Title is incorrect

Proper title is Go DJ, without the periods. See here. --InDeBiz1 (talk) 22:27, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

See here. BigTVFan (talk) 22:35, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Without seeing the Parental Warning tag on that image (since the song carried lyrics that would justify it), I have no reason to believe the linked image to be reliable. Plus, images stored on a general storage site such as that are, by Wikipedia policy, unreliable. The Amazon.com tracklisting would have been provided by the record label, which is a strong, reliable source on the subject... the fact that you're arguing with a radio professional about a subject that I know very well, given that I work in the industry full-time and dedicate 70+ hours each week to it completely notwithstanding things.--InDeBiz1 (talk) 22:45, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't have the Parental Advisory since it's the edited version. How is it un-reliable if it's official? BigTVFan (talk) 00:28, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That's just it, you can't prove that's the official cover. Look over my previous post (under my old username) for why I don't believe that you have a reliable source, please. I'm much more inclined to rely on Amazon.com's notation of the title, as I've described above, then some random image hosting website. --Winger84 (talk) 01:10, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Deletion

Hi, I don't think this article is worth existing. Unless someone has something to write, it should be deleted. We shouldn't use Wikipedia as a "placeholder" for future article. Germ (talk) 22:44, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]