Talk:Goemon's Great Adventure/GA1
Appearance
GA Reassessment
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- Remove refs in lead that are used elsewhere. There is a 1-line quote in audio that should be incoperated with the prose. Finally the article needs some serious copyediting.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- Tagged info needing citations.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- The gameplay section is far to long and detailed. The character section is also rather long compared to the relatively short plot. The plot lacks any info on an ending. The audio section could be tightened up as well.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- The images should be using a template with good explanation why the images are needed as they are all fair-use. In addition the number of images and songs are likely inappropriate for an article of this size.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Cover image has now got a better fair use, but could still do with a reduction in size. Salavat (talk) 00:30, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- putting this on hold for a week as nothing seems too difficult to fix陣内Jinnai04 November 2009 (UTC)
- Given that only 1 signifigant edit was made in the past week (several other edits were made but reverted to the bot edit after i added {{cn}} templates) i am closing this as a fail. Should someone decide to clean it up soon, it should be able to get back to GA status.陣内Jinnai 22:12, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
- putting this on hold for a week as nothing seems too difficult to fix陣内Jinnai04 November 2009 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail: