Talk:Green Europe

	European Union portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject European Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the European Union on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European UnionWikipedia:WikiProject European UnionTemplate:WikiProject European UnionEuropean Union articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Italy

	Italy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Green Politics (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Green Politics, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Green PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject Green PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Green PoliticsGreen Politics articles

"progressive"

Sounds more like a euphemism, try left-wing or socialist.

46.93.254.13 (talk) 23:59, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I do not see the problem. Definitely, "Progressivism" is a more generic concept than "Socialism", but this party is progressive, not socialist. When "Socialism" or "Social democracy" is already mentioned, "Progressivism" is redundant. This is not our case. --Checco (talk) 13:26, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I changed my mind: "progressivism" is redundant also when "green politics" is mentioned. --Checco (talk) 13:54, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ideology: consensus and status quo ante

"Pro-Europeanism" has not been part of the ideology field in the infobox, at least not durably, and there has never been consensus on it, no matter what individual users think about the party's ideology (is this this party pro-Europeanist? really?) and whether "pro-Europeanism" is an ideology or not (it is not). The same is true for "progressivism", a generic and redundant ideology given that the party clearly adheres to "green politics", and "feminism", which is surely not central in the party's ideology (no less than most green or left-wing/centre-left parties in Europe: feminism is only seldom mentioned in the infobox or the lead). Thus, "pro-Europeanism" should be removed from the infobox and the lead, while the latter two from the lead. Bold edits are fine as long as they are not challenged and/or go against consensus and/or the staus quo ante, that is the established version of the article. Per Wikipedia:Consensus, "when discussions of proposals to add, modify, or remove material in articles end without consensus, the common result is to retain the version of the article as it was prior to the proposal or bold edit". There was never a discussion on the issue, let alone two comments on "progressivism" above. Before adding "pro-Europeanism" or anything else to the infobox or the lead, please seek consensus first. -- Checco (talk) 13:54, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Start a discussion about improving the Green Europe page

Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve the "Green Europe" page.

Start a discussion