Talk:HMS Hampshire (1903)/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Parsecboy (talk · contribs) 17:05, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
b (MoS):
- " commander-in-chief of the China Station, to destroy the German radio station at Yap together with" - it seems like that should have been split after "the China Station" and that something like "She was ordered..." should be inserted there.
- I am prone to string a few too many facts into one sentence. Fixed.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 22:20, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
- " commander-in-chief of the China Station, to destroy the German radio station at Yap together with" - it seems like that should have been split after "the China Station" and that something like "She was ordered..." should be inserted there.
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Images both check out.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- 'Not much here to pick on, just that one sentence that reads funny to me. Parsecboy (talk) 17:05, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for the review.
- Looks good, passing now. Parsecboy (talk) 12:27, 24 March 2014 (UTC)