Jump to content

Talk:HMS Hampshire (1903)/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Parsecboy (talk · contribs) 17:05, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    " commander-in-chief of the China Station, to destroy the German radio station at Yap together with" - it seems like that should have been split after "the China Station" and that something like "She was ordered..." should be inserted there.
    I am prone to string a few too many facts into one sentence. Fixed.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 22:20, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    Images both check out.
  7. Overall:
    'Not much here to pick on, just that one sentence that reads funny to me. Parsecboy (talk) 17:05, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review.

Looks good, passing now. Parsecboy (talk) 12:27, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]