Talk:HMS Triumph (1903)/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Jackyd101 (talk · contribs) 00:09, 7 April 2012 (UTC) Hi there, I am happy to tell you that this article has passed GA without the need for any further improvement. Listed below is information on how the article fared against the Wikipedia:good article criteria, with suggestions for future development. These are not required to achieve GA standard, but they might help in future A-class or FAC review process.
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
b (MoS):
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- Is a link to South American dreadnought race relevant for the design paragraph (this point is also relevant to the HMS Swiftsure (1903) article I reviewed a few days ago).
- Captain during the First World War was Maurice Swynfen Fitzmaurice - this should be mentioned in the article.
- It would be beneficial to incorporate some information on the wreck of Triumph. This website [1] might not qualify as an RS, but it does demonstrate that there is interest in the wreck as a dive site and that there has been a National Geographic documentary made on the shipwreck.
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- a (fair representation):
b (all significant views):
- a (fair representation):
- It is stable.
- It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
- a (tagged and captioned):
b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA):
c (non-free images have fair use rationales):
- a (tagged and captioned):
- Overall:
- a Pass/Fail:
- a Pass/Fail:
Thankyou and congratulations, an excellent addition to Wikipedia:Good Articles. All the best.--Jackyd101 (talk) 00:09, 7 April 2012 (UTC)