Talk:HTC Touch Pro

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Bluetooth#Bluetooth v2.0 .2B EDR|Bluetooth 2.0 + EDR]]

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Criticism[edit]

The HTC Touch Pro does not work in American or Canadian 3G networks... Which Touch Pro? From the main site and this sentence one might gather that the AT&T version doesn't work on those networks. (i'm unsure if it works on Canada's but know it works on American 3G) MikelZap (talk) 16:10, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I still don't see any citations on this, it has a source but the course doen't mention anything about which networks particular devices work on. Since i really like this phone i may take on the challenge of redoing the page, I believe i can keep the no-PoV and write it correctly with sources, so we will see. MikelZap (talk) 17:07, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think saying "The HTC Touch Pro does not work in American or Canadian 3G networks" is misleading, since the CDMA version of this phone does indeed work with EVDO which is also a 3G network. Cl191 (talk) 13:25, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

the AT&T fuze is a touch pro and it's on a 3g network i still don't evven understand what the user was trying to say about them not working. Maybe if you buy a Touch Pro in Canada it's locked somehow and cannot be used in all other countries?MikelZap (talk) 20:32, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Picture[edit]

I just realized i should have the keyboard in it's open position demonstrating the difference between itself and the HTC diamond. Does anyone else read this? MikelZap (talk) 23:02, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Picture -- hacked + no webcam!!![edit]

The Touch Pro in the picture is hacked! You can see that Opera is set as the Left softkey, and not Phone. Also, can we get a shot a of Touch Pro with a webcam? I would take one myself but mine has no webcam OR Carrier name... --MasterOfTheXP (talk) 21:29, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes my touch pro is hacked, if you have ever had an AT&T smartphone you would know why, i actually removed all the graphical enhancements so TF3D wasn't different i'm planning on taking a different picture anyways. The touch pro with a front facing camera is one of many touch pro's i'm guessing only half of the TPs out there have front cameras for video conferencing/calling. I would be careful how you address situations on this site, freaking out saying HACKED + NO WEBCAM isn't really the best way to go about it.MikelZap (talk) 20:31, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's not really hacked, just customized. But showing a stock TF3D would probably be better, even if some carriers do use different themes (ie- ATT Fuze's gray theme vs HTC's black). We should get a higher quality picture in there, not some blurry pic (sorry MasterOfTheXP). Maybe have two pics- one for the GSM version, the other CDMA version, since they look somewhat different. --Corneliusm (talk) 19:20, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Luxury smartphone?[edit]

The lead says that the Touch Pro is a "luxury smartphone". What exactly is a luxury smartphone, and why does the Touch Pro qualify as one? It seems like it's simply a buzz word thrown in by an editor. Brianreading (talk) 02:05, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Weight correction[edit]

The weight spec should be corrected. It is actually 5.8oz (http://www.htc.com/us/support/htc-fuze/tech-specs/) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.102.234.10 (talk) 17:17, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on HTC Touch Pro. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:01, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]