Talk:Haplogroup E-V38
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Haplogroup E-V38 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
Haplogroup E-V38 was one of the Natural sciences good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Delisted good article |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Paleolithic West African Origins
[edit]"Shriner et al. (2018) similarly suggests that haplogroup E1b1a-V38 migrated across the Green Sahara from east to west around 19,000 years ago, where E1b1a1-M2 may have subsequently originated in West Africa or Central Africa. Shriner et al. (2018) also traces this migration via sickle cell mutation, which likely originated during the Green Sahara period.[3]"
Problem: this hypothesis is not supported by archaeology. No E1b1a, or YRI, Gambian/Jola or Eastern Bantu dna has been found in West Africa prior to 1,000 BC, if that. 3,000 years ago...
"In the supposed cradle of Bantu languages and, therefore, Bantu people, these people are basically ‘pygmy' hunter-gatherers," says Lluís Quintana-Murci, a population geneticist at the Pasteur Institute and CNRS, the French national research agency, who was not part of the new study."
(SCIENCE) DNA from child burials reveals ‘profoundly different' human landscape in ancient Africa Children’s skeletons yield genomes more than 3000 years old 22 Jan 2020 By Ann Gibbons 2001:1C00:1E20:D900:B5AA:96B:F68F:4FF5 (talk) 11:08, 30 October 2024 (UTC)