Talk:Hapsidophyllas

Animals Low‑importance

Hapsidophyllas is within the scope of WikiProject Animals, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to animals and zoology. For more information, visit the project page.AnimalsWikipedia:WikiProject AnimalsTemplate:WikiProject Animalsanimal articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Animals To-do:

Here are some Open Tasks :

Copyedit:
Merge: GLAM/ARKive donated texts into articles about endangered species.
Improve: Photoperiodism, Tool use by non-human animals, Omnivore, Animal suicide, Sphaerium beckmani (a species in family Sphaeriidae),
Requests:
- Mammals:
- Invertebrates: Campocraspedon
- Fishes: Zaniolepis frenata
Merge: GLAM/ARKive donated texts into articles about endangered species.
Expand: Junqueira cow, Atka mackerel
Nominate and vote: Science collaboration of the month, Article Improvement Drive, WikiProject Animals Collaboration

Palaeontology Low‑importance

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Proposed merge of Hapsidophyllas flexibilis with Hapsidophyllas

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result of this discussion was to merge. YorkshireExpat (talk) 21:23, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The genus has only one described species. See WP:MONOTYPICFAUNA. William Avery (talk) 15:14, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support: per nom. Scorpions13256 (talk) 20:12, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support: Name of the article should be Hapsidophyllas. YorkshireExpat (talk) 18:32, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Reference

Shouldn't this reference be included into the article https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12542-020-00537-4? Since it practically gives insight into the ecology of H. flexibilis and also gives a ton of information regarding the description of it. Rugoconites Tenuirugosus (talk) 20:34, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]