Talk:Hertz Corp. v. Friend
Appearance
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is a mess and needs to be rewritten from scratch
[edit]Unfortunately, I don't have time to brief the case from scratch right now, but it looks like whomever wrote this either has no idea how to read a judicial opinion or is trying to see how long they can get away with vandalizing Wikipedia with blatantly false content. The article summarizes the holding of the case in a way that ends up being the opposite of the high court's holding. --Coolcaesar (talk) 11:17, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
HEY! I wanted to add in that I agree with the guy above. This case is totally messed up. Has the holding of a lower court as the holding of the Supreme Court. I'm too busy too to fix it but somebody needs to rewrite the article from scratch - Z