Talk:Highgrove, Stamford

This article was nominated for deletion on 4 January 2010 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

This article provides only facts about the building. The information provided includes the the history, amenities, residences and location. This information is all factual, and has credible and verifiable references to back up all the information provided. In no way is there any information listed to persuade a reader into believing anything other than what is the truth. To reduce the amount written about this building would be an injustice, as its amenities and residences are of a unique, and luxurious level. I have even reduced the amount of writing to just bullet points for certain sections, to reduce the amount of bias written about the building, and to provide only what is offered throughout the building.

Todtanis (talk) 16:30, 4 January 2010 (UTC)todtanis[reply]

Additionally, I further edited the article to be written in a more neutral tone. With all of these edits, I believe that this is a integral article for Wikipedia, and will considered a good addition of relevant and useful information.

Todtanis (talk) 17:46, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Name change

At the AfD for this article, which was withdrawn, it was suggested that the article name should be changed as it is non-neutral. It appears the official name of the development is anyway just "Highgrove". I propose:

This article should be renamed "Highgrove, Stamford"
The existing article Highgrove should be renamed "Highgrove House"
Highgrove should be a DAB page linking to Highgrove House, Highgrove, California and this page.

Any objections? I42 (talk) 17:48, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

None received; moves etc now complete. I42 (talk) 22:38, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NPOV

This article got heavily criticised at AfD for being non-neutral. It seems to me it has swung too far to the other extreme - it is now unduly negative. I42 (talk) 08:11, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]