Talk:Historia Normannis
![]() | Reenactment Stub‑class (inactive) | ||||||
|
Sources / Notability[edit]
I'm concerned that this page does not meet the standards for WP:significant coverage as per WP:ORG / WP:NORG. Many pages for re-enactment groups end up flagged for deletion (eg. look at edit history for List_of_historical_reenactment_groups to see the casualties), so should be seriously looked into by the authors of this page. I've included the Source Assessment Table for working within Wikipedia's General Notability Guidelines. Blaene (talk) 15:22, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
Source assessment table:
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
"Knights in shining armour battle on Southampton Common" | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
"Weekend Warriors" | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
"Historia Normannis Official Website" | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}. |
Untitled[edit]
Left a skeletal and unbiased framework- given the group have been featured on TV on at least two occasions, are mentioned on other pages and have multiple published mentions in media I believe the page is now justified (versus simple self-promotion). More media references to follow as we find the dated articles. Any objective statements and similar welcomed; -DF