Talk:Holism and Evolution
Appearance
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I suggest removing the second paragraph of the summary. Given that Smuts coined the term 'holism,' how could it be viewed as part of a broader trend? The reference to Smuts' earlier book on Walt Whitman is inconsequential, and the book does not refer to a process-orientated, hierarchical view of nature. Holism and Evolution is a book on philosophy. It is inappropriate to link it to his political views, especially without reference and certainly not in the introductory summary.
Start a discussion about improving the Holism and Evolution page
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve the "Holism and Evolution" page.
Categories:
- Start-Class Philosophy articles
- Low-importance Philosophy articles
- Start-Class philosophical literature articles
- Low-importance philosophical literature articles
- Philosophical literature task force articles
- Start-Class metaphysics articles
- Low-importance metaphysics articles
- Metaphysics task force articles
- Start-Class Analytic philosophy articles
- Low-importance Analytic philosophy articles
- Analytic philosophy task force articles
- Start-Class Contemporary philosophy articles
- Low-importance Contemporary philosophy articles
- Contemporary philosophy task force articles