Jump to content

Talk:Hollywood Undercover/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 20:41, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Checking against GA criteria

[edit]
GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    WEll written and sufficiently follows the MoS
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    All online references are live, assume good faith for off-line sources, all sources sufficiently reliable, the artcile is well referenced.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    Sufficiently broad and focussed
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
    Neutral
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    A non free use rationale has been supplied. There was no caption for the book cover, so I added one
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    WEll, I just read it through another time and I really can't fault it apart from the lack of caption, which I decided to address directly. Congratulations on another good article. Jezhotwells (talk) 21:00, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much! Cirt (talk) 00:21, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]