Talk:Hollywood Undercover/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 20:41, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.
Checking against GA criteria
[edit]- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- WEll written and sufficiently follows the MoS
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- All online references are live, assume good faith for off-line sources, all sources sufficiently reliable, the artcile is well referenced.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- Sufficiently broad and focussed
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Neutral
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- A non free use rationale has been supplied. There was no caption for the book cover, so I added one
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- WEll, I just read it through another time and I really can't fault it apart from the lack of caption, which I decided to address directly. Congratulations on another good article. Jezhotwells (talk) 21:00, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail:
Thank you very much! Cirt (talk) 00:21, 17 January 2010 (UTC)