Talk:Holt Manufacturing Company/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: S Masters (talk) 09:34, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- Minor prose issues which I have fixed, and article complies to MoS.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- All references appear to be in order.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- Requirements in this area have been met.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Complies with WP:NPOV.
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- Article appears to be stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Pictures comply with fair use requirements and captions are all in order.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Summary: There were a few minor prose issues, mainly to do with punctuation. As they were minor, I decided to fix these myself. A lot of work has gone into this article. I am satisfied that this article complies with all the requirements for a Good Article, and I am happy to pass it for GA status. Congratulations to all those involved.