Talk:Homework (Daft Punk album)/GA1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

GA Reassessment[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Starting GA reassessment as part of the GA Sweeps process. Jezhotwells (talk) 14:01, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria[edit]

Symbol unsupport vote.svg To uphold the quality of Wikipedia:Good articles, all articles listed as Good articles are being reviewed against the GA criteria as part of the GA project quality task force. While all the hard work that has gone into this article is appreciated, unfortunately, as of February 26, 2010, this article fails to satisfy the criteria, as detailed below. For that reason, the article has been delisted from WP:GA. However, if improvements are made bringing the article up to standards, the article may be nominated at WP:GAN. If you feel this decision has been made in error, you may seek remediation at WP:GAR.

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    During the same year, Tom Rowlands and Ed Simons requested that the duo remix their single "Life Is Sweet" and open for The Chemical Brothers' tour in the United Kingdom.[ Subject unclear- is this a Chemical Brothers single or a Daft Punk singel?
    Lead does not adequately summarise the article as per WP:LEAD
    Although Virgin held exclusive distribution rights over Daft Punk’s material, the duo remain the owners of their master recordings through the Daft Trax label. Does someone else now hold the distribution rights?
    The following track, "WDPK 83.7 FM" is considered a tribute to FM radio displayed in the United States Displayed?
    The broadcast compression is one of the major influences in Daft Punk's music The broadcast compersion of hwat? Or was it just meant to say Broadcast compression is one of the major influences in Daft Punk's music?
    The Structure section feels very bitty - conisder a rewrite to improve prose and flow.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    I repaired two dead links using this tool
    Adequately referenced to RS.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    Are their any reviews?
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    OK
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    On hold for seven days for above issues to be addressed. Major contributors and projects will be notified. Jezhotwells (talk) 14:34, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
    OK, no one has responded in seven days so I am de-listing thjis. Jezhotwells (talk) 09:45, 26 February 2010 (UTC)