Jump to content

Talk:Hồng Lĩnh

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Hong Linh)

The above template was added by User Kauffner 06:24, 17 December 2012‎ Kauffner

1st db-G6 moved article counter RM but left Talk behind, 2nd db-G6 refused, 3rd db-G6 above

[edit]

The talk page appears to be have been separated by Efe, responding to a db-G6 request counter result of Talk:Cần Thơ 07 Aug 2011:

(cur | prev) 14:19, 4 November 2011‎ Efe (talk | contribs)‎ m . . (3,364 bytes) (0)‎ . . (moved Hồng Lĩnh Township to Hong Linh: Per request.) (undo)

Efe moved the article (countrary to RM result) from Hồng Lĩnh Township to Hong Linh, but forgot to move the Talk page. The Talk Page and WP Project Tag are still sitting there at Talk:Hồng Lĩnh Township. Rather than a second db-G6 counter Talk:Cần Thơ and previous and susbsequent geo RMs it appears to be the article move by Efe which needs to be undone and the Talk page left where it is - at status quo agreeing with RM result. In ictu oculi (talk) 07:00, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You're protesting a page alignment? This is blatant hounding. Thị xã translates as "town", not "township." Kauffner (talk) 09:46, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
You were told by admin Malik Shabazz on your 2nd db-G6:
  • 07:58, 11 December 2012‎ Malik Shabazz (talk | contribs)‎ . . (37 bytes) (-163)‎ . . (Speedy deletion declined. Try a move discussion (CSDH)) (undo)
My highlighter for emphasis. Malik Shabazz also left a message on your Talk page. In ictu oculi (talk) 10:52, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Kauffner, that is WP:PA. You need to stop making personal attacks such as, "troll" on Gimmeetoo, posting a picture of a serpent for me, etc. on any editors and admins who suggest you observe RM and RfC results. It's not "spite" it's just not letting you move things counter RM and RfC result.
The page can easily be aligned. You only have have to put in a TR on WP:RM to return it to where it before your first move counter the RM result on 07 Aug 2011 i.e. Hồng Lĩnh Township. Simple. Just return to where it was at the RM result of August 2011. In ictu oculi (talk) 11:57, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


........actually do you realise the db-G6 template you have in above is to achieve exactly the reverse of where the article was on 07 August 2011? Article can easily be restored to Hồng Lĩnh Township and Talk:Hồng Lĩnh Township is already where it always was. In ictu oculi (talk) 12:05, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. I've merged the talk page history and moved it to this location. The earlier history can be found at Talk:Hong Linh, Ha Tinh/Archive 1. This is not an endorsement of the current title, which was decided without any discussion. As I said on my talk page, I ask that In ictu oculi, as the one who objects to the current title, start an RM to get community input for a new title. I'd really rather not see any further move warring here (or anywhere). Thanks,Cúchullain t/c 16:59, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Thai Binh which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 16:43, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:19, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Phú Mỹ Town which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 19:17, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 12:07, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]