Talk:Honour and Passion
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Wrong Sypnosis
[edit]This series had no gay storylines. But this is amazingly funny. —Preceding unsigned comment added by N0rm4nch3w (talk • contribs) 16:51, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
- I watched this show and i know the sypnosis is wrong too Yun Zhen 10:06, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
As far as I know the synopsis is true to the spirit of the Singapore Armed Forces.
- Think people mistaken this series for an older mediacorp series Are You My Brother?. This old army-sponsored series made more sense than Honour and Passion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by BestEditorEver88 (talk • contribs) 13:22, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
- hmmm... i think so. The two series were pretty similar, although the older one focuses more on comedy. Are You My Brother? was pretty forgettable, unlike shows like the Golden Pillow.Juggernaut999 13:25, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
I don't quite have any source in hand, but IIRC, Are You My Brother is a military-based series that doesn't involve gay storylines while this recent one does. And many other differences too, but essentially the director seemed to have ripped off a bit from that series. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.116.59.28 (talk) 11:02, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
- wrong storyline? Don't think so. Must have mistaken for another series.PowerClown123 10:29, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
the story outline was maked out. hence , it was deleted. I luv erky 11:39, 7 October 2007 (UTC) please delete
i have corrected this page (: Stormynight91 02:35, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
Dubious Content being added
[edit]i have undid twice the addition of dubious content to the article. Both additions are similar in essence to previously identified and reverted vandalism [1] which were in turn taken from Uncyclopedia[[2]]. I had also tried googling for any mention of this new questionable content without success. Would be great if the anonymous IPs can provide a source, else its just questionable original research at best. Just in case, however, I will be posting a description of this edit to other Singaporean editors/admins, maybe they have a more accurate take on it. In any case, As per WP:PLOTSUMNOT, it is not necessary to include every minute detail, especially if it is in doubt and removal does not affect the main article. Zhanzhao (talk) 02:40, 8 October 2011 (UTC)