Talk:Horn shark/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Hi, I am reviewing this article for GA and have made a few copy editing changes which you are free to revert where I have changed the meaning. This is a wonderfully informative article.
GA review (see here for criteria)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): Clearly written
b (MoS): Follows required MoS elements
- a (prose): Clearly written
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): Well referenced
b (citations to reliable sources): Sources are reliable
c (OR): No OR
- a (references): Well referenced
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): Cover the major areas
b (focused): Remains focused on the topic
- a (major aspects): Cover the major areas
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias: Neutral
- Fair representation without bias: Neutral
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.: Stable
- No edit wars etc.: Stable
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail: Pass
- Pass/Fail: Pass
Congratulations!