Talk:Hudson (software)

Java Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Java, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Java on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JavaWikipedia:WikiProject JavaTemplate:WikiProject JavaJava articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Computing: Software

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software.

Jenkins

I suggest a rename and redirect following the vote. - 71.75.35.33 (talk) 12:41, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree, these are now two separate OSS Projects and have a life and community of their own. A redirect would be totally incorrect Duncan Mills (talk) 20:59, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

History of Rename/Fork

The rename / fork is important and relevant. In my opinion, the removed paragraph should be restored, although it should be expanded to also record the differing opinions on whether Jenkins is a fork or a rename. Pelegri (talk) 05:00, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done, with effort made to fairly represent the current situation --jodastephen (talk) 09:12, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. It's much better if an external observer does the changes. Let's see what happens next. Pelegri (talk) 14:18, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I put the sentence "Both the Jenkins and Hudson projects appear to consider the other to be a fork" with a citation needed tag. On the Jenkins' website [1], we can read in their Introductory Articles section : "Note that many links below refer to Hudson, the original name of Jenkins." I think that it's an proof of the fact the Jenkins' community considers it as a fork of Hudson, and not the contrary. So, the sentence present in the article should, in my opinion, be deleted. 82.220.1.196 (talk) 07:46, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done --M4gnum0n (talk) 11:47, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hudson trademark

"Oracle claimed that it acquired the Hudson trademark with its purchase of Sun Microsystems. But a well-placed former Sun Microsystems employee has contacted The Reg to say that Sun took an "explicit decision" not to apply for a trademark on the name Hudson. A search of the US Patent and Trademark Office's website throws up 623 trademarks for Hudson for many things, but not for the project Oracle owns." -- http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/12/03/oracle_doesnt_own_hudson/ —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.44.244.108 (talk) 10:58, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No 3.4.0

The latest version is 3.3.3: https://www.eclipse.org/hudson/changelog.php https://git.eclipse.org/c/hudson/org.eclipse.hudson.core.git/log/ https://www.eclipse.org/hudson/download.php

There is a page about version 3.4.0: https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/technology.hudson

But it is about a planned and never released version: https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/technology.hudson/releases/3.4.0 "Hudson 3.4.0 will be a Minor release in Eclipse terms, encapsulating new features and bug fixes for Hudson 3. At this stage we do not anticpate any library changes (hence this is only classed as a minor release)" "Bugs and Enhancements desired for this release should be tagged in the whiteboard with candidate-3.4.0 as the tag." — Preceding unsigned comment added by -- (talk • contribs) 07:38, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Hudson (software). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:47, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Etymology

Is it named after Angus Hudson? 89.64.68.220 (talk) 14:02, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]