Talk:Hydnellum peckii/GA1
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Rcej (Robert) - talk 07:54, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
Interesting one here! Two things first: in Description, define 'stipitate hydnoid'. In Microscopic features, break this into two sentences "The hyphae of the cap are hyaline (translucent), smooth, thin-walled, collapsing when dried, forming an intricate tangle with a tendency to run longitudinally, septate with simple clamp-connections, segments extremely long, slender, uniform, 3–4 µm side, branching diffuse." I'd have ce'd it, but I didn't want to step on some of the... fungal syntax. heh.-- Rcej (Robert) - talk 07:54, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
- I tried to reduce jargon and simplify sentences like so... better? Sasata (talk) 09:25, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
- Nice :) Next; stretch Edibility a little if possible, and in Habitat, distr. and eco. the use of the term 'pseudotissue' in "They are characterized by a plectenchymatous (referring to a pseudotissue formed by more or less tightly interwoven filaments)..." sort of clouds the context of the sentence. I felt fixated on trying to visualize a pseudotissue. heh.-- Rcej (Robert) - talk 04:09, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
- Ok, here's some changes to address these issues. Sasata (talk) 06:39, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
- Great... and more images too! We're done here.-- Rcej (Robert) - talk 07:45, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks! Sasata (talk) 08:14, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
- Great... and more images too! We're done here.-- Rcej (Robert) - talk 07:45, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
- Ok, here's some changes to address these issues. Sasata (talk) 06:39, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
- Nice :) Next; stretch Edibility a little if possible, and in Habitat, distr. and eco. the use of the term 'pseudotissue' in "They are characterized by a plectenchymatous (referring to a pseudotissue formed by more or less tightly interwoven filaments)..." sort of clouds the context of the sentence. I felt fixated on trying to visualize a pseudotissue. heh.-- Rcej (Robert) - talk 04:09, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
Results of review
[edit]The article Hydnellum peckii passes this review, and has been upgraded to good article status. The article is found by the reviewing editor to be deserving of good article status based on the following criteria:
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail: Pass
- Pass/Fail: Pass