|The contents of the merged into Supercar on January 2018 and it now redirects there. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history.page were|
|This page was nominated for deletion on 25 November 2017. The result of the discussion was merge.|
|WikiProject Automobiles||(Rated Start-class, Low-importance)|
Overall article quality is pretty bad...
Props to the creator of this page, but the entire page seems very biased. The fact this page exists is pretty weird too, as there is no proper definition of the hypercar. And, since a hypercar is only a subcategory of a sports car, like how a supercar is only a subcategory of a sports car, this page should really only belong as one with either the Supercar article, or the Sports car article, but I understand why this was created. Another page called Hypercar already exists too, so the title should be at least be disambiguated from that page.
The article is okay, but I think serious improvement is a must.
This is the dumbest article in the history of Wikipedia
This should probably be deleted
"Do not be discouraged if you think less of supercars after educating yourself on this topic," ... "when the next cooler update is created"
This sounds like a copy paste of a promotional brochure or some 15 year old's essay for school.
Wouldn't it be better to delete this article, and add a short description under the existing supercar article? The entry on super cars is shorter than this, which is absurd. Better to combine the two.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.8.131.52 (talk) 16:45, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
Some references are too opinionated for Wikipedia use.
Come on, seriously? What makes the creator think that opinionated references are available for use on a Wikipedia page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:56A:F398:2100:F1DC:6278:35B3:3F8D (talk) 01:23, 23 November 2017 (UTC)