Talk:IBM Lotus Organizer

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software.

Does anyone have experience with web publisher on the the Lotus Organizer

64bit Windows 7 is now a supported platform

http://www-10.lotus.com/ldd/ssforum.nsf/55c38d716d632d9b8525689b005ba1c0/cce4aa143c9729078525785600680acc?OpenDocument --Bstard12 (talk) 00:26, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

POV/cleanup

This article suffers from questionable grammar and a clear POV slant, e.g. (emphasis added):

Organizer was the first and most important software to be used as an agenda and its usability was so good that even now is still appreciated.
The famous Covey organizer has a current software version that is obviously inspired in the Lotus Organizer.
It is surprising how Lotus and IBM let go the chance of filling a market niche that Outlook never could reach.

Don't get me wrong: I like Organizer. I used to use it (back in the 16-bit days). But this article needs attention. EJSawyer (talk) 18:45, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on IBM Lotus Organizer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120515120505/http://www-947.ibm.com/support/entry/portal/overview/software/lotus/lotus_smartsuite to http://www-947.ibm.com/support/entry/portal/overview//software/lotus/lotus_smartsuite

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:54, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]