Talk:IRS Volunteer Income Tax Assistance Program

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 25 August 2021 and 17 December 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): SjolieW1. Peer reviewers: Kalinatodorov, Imanqadir.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 00:12, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Volunteer Population

The volunteers are no longer restricted to being accounting students. Though accounting students are encouraged to participate, just about anyone can volunteer.Davisjrg5 (talk) 04:59, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

This is undoubtedly machine translated.

-fixed (somewhat...), and added stub tag. N. Paul Inast 15:45, 24 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was Merge Forms Only. — Morphh ^(talk) 02:20, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merge

I suggest we merge all these U.S. Forms (and any others) and "IRS Volunteer Income Tax Assistance Program" into a new article titled United States tax forms or Tax forms in the United States. If it is too big, we could merge all the 1040 Forms into one and add a summary style to the main article. Offer preference of article title if you have one. Morphh ^(talk) 16:50, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Support

Morphh ^(talk) 16:51, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Partial support: Forms only, none of the IRS programs should be included Hansonc 03:58, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I agree. All Forms Only. Andrew 00:39, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose

I think the VITA article doesn't really belong on a United States tax forms page, since it is a program not a form. -Moorlock 21:04, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok... what about the other forms...? Morphh ^(talk) 21:11, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I posted to Moorlock's talk - It appears his concern was the VITA article, which the others also opposed. Morphh ^(talk) 02:20, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]