Talk:List of ITU-T V-series recommendations

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Telecommunications

	Telecommunication portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Telecommunications, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Telecommunications on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TelecommunicationsWikipedia:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTemplate:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTelecommunications articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Cwolfsheep 18:38, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikified

Wikified as part of the Wikification wikiproject! Renamed article as requested above. JubalHarshaw 14:47, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Simultaneous transmission of data and other signals"

does anyone know why the 56K standard was put in this section. Also are there other such reccomendations that aren't listed in this article that actually perform such simultanious transmission? Plugwash 00:38, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Any V.60-V.99 would fall into that category. Why the ITU decided to put V.92 there instead of V.10-V.39 with the other modems I don't know, but they're the standards organization, we're just documenting what they did. — RevRagnarok ^{Talk Contrib} 13:37, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Plurals

The plural of 'Baud' is - well it doesn't have a plural. The word 'Bauds' has been changed to 'Baud' throughout the article.

V.33

V.33 redirects here, but is not listed in the article. 195.220.102.97 15:40, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rescinding Template:Expert-Subject flagging

The article has been flagged with Template:Expert-subject for over 2 years now, and in that time has received substantial expert refinement. Thanks to the contributions of User:71.254.221.8, among many others, it appears to be in quite good shape from a technical perspective.

As I don't see anything in the article that directly requires expert attention, and there's nothing here on the talk page that directly addresses expert-attention needs, I'm going to be bold and remove the box. Anyone who disagrees with this change is invited to reverse it, and encouraged to share any specific concerns here. FeRD_NYC (talk) 19:39, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Recommendations

Building off the quote "The international standards that are produced by the ITU-T are referred to as "Recommendations" (with the word ordinarily capitalized to distinguish its meaning from the ordinary sense of the word "recommendation"), as they become mandatory only when adopted as part of a national law." from the ITU-T page. Should the use of "recommendations" be capitalized throughout this article? 216.54.1.35 (talk) 16:52, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dates of introduction

Does anyone know when each standard was introduced/ratified/etc, and roughly when the first practical use was made of them (i.e. at least two modems supporting the standard had been sold to the public)?

I'm trying to figure out at the moment what typical online speeds would have been around 1991 without having to delve into randomly scanned back issues of computer magazines (my own memory is no good, as although we had a computer at the time, talk of online services came down to passing mentioned of BBSes...), and as it stands this page is no help at all :( 193.63.174.211 (talk) 08:43, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of ITU-T V-series recommendations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070104124418/http://fndcg0.fnal.gov/Net/modm8-94.txt to http://fndcg0.fnal.gov/Net/modm8-94.txt

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:51, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

HST in Ad Hoc Standards

Should the US Robotics HST standard be listed in the Ad Hoc standards section? Chris Fletcher (talk) 02:45, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on List of ITU-T V-series recommendations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:38, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

V.34 / 33.8

I removed mention that the '96 variant of the V.34 spec had a 33.8k signaling rate. I've since been informed that there is a table buried in the spec that shows this number, but as far as I can tell this is some kind of internal technical note and not practical. The title of the spec plainly says "rates of up to 33 600 bit/s" and the summary lists 33.6 as the highest speed option above 28.8. Gravislizard (talk) 16:35, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]