Talk:Imaginary Heroes

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Film (Rated Start-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
Checklist icon
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Fair use rationale for Image:Imaginary Heroes (poster).jpg[edit]

Nuvola apps important.svg

Image:Imaginary Heroes (poster).jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:48, 5 June 2007 (UTC)


After reviewing the changes to the plot, I feel that the previous version was better, for a few reasons. First, the new plot was in second person (it used "you"), which is generally unacceptable in Wikipedia articles (see MOS:YOU). Second, it included a lot of details, like direct quotes, that go beyond the level of necessary detail for plot summaries. It was especially odd to me because some scenes were explained in very high detail, while others where done in overview style. Overall, we want a broad summary of the movie, not individual lines or points. While the current summary isn't perfect either, I thought it was better than the altered version. I'll try to copy edit it in a bit. Qwyrxian (talk) 01:56, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

Why isn't the ending mentioned? Use some spoiler tags, and give an actual synopsis. I haven't seen this movie. Could someone who has provide the plot of the rest of the film? It's too ambiguous.El erico (talk) 00:43, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
We don't use spoiler tags, but, yes, the full plot should be given. I haven't seen the movie itself, so I'm no help there, but anyone else is certainly welcome to take a stab at it. I will happily copy-edit afterward if anyone needs help. Qwyrxian (talk) 02:26, 8 April 2011 (UTC)