Kind of a silly article, ey?
This page seems more primed for a disambiguation article; it looks incompetent as it is. Jafet 16:26, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
2007-08-11 Automated pywikipediabot message
|This page has been transwikied to Wiktionary.
The article has content that is useful at Wiktionary. Therefore the article can be found at either here or here (logs 1 logs 2.)
Note: This means that the article has been copied to the Wiktionary Transwiki namespace for evaluation and formatting. It does not mean that the article is in the Wiktionary main namespace, or that it has been removed from Wikipedia's. Furthermore, the Wiktionarians might delete the article from Wiktionary if they do not find it to be appropriate for the Wiktionary.
Removing this tag will usually trigger CopyToWiktionaryBot to re-transwiki the entry. This article should have been removed from Category:Copy to Wiktionary and should not be re-added there.
--CopyToWiktionaryBot 02:51, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
This page begins:
Incompetence is the inability to perform; lack of competence; ineptitude.
- Royal Mail .. well this word sums them up
That's quite the lulz, but that doesn't seem very encyclopedic, and there's no supporting argument for that statement. The author has not shown why Royal Mail makes for a good example of incompetence. Anyone got anything, or should I just delete this? NoriMori (ノリモリ) 03:33, 14 September 2010 (UTC)