Talk:Input/output Buffer Information Specification

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Input/output Buffer Information Specification article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Computing: Software Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Mid-importance).

Engineering Low‑importance

	Engineering portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EngineeringWikipedia:WikiProject EngineeringTemplate:WikiProject EngineeringEngineering articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

IBIS [...] is a method of providing information about the input/output buffers of an integrated circuit to the outside world.

What are input/output buffers of an IC?

The idea of IBIS is to provide the behavioral aspects of a circuit without providing the actual circuit information to the user.

What is meant with behavior? What differentiates it from actual circuit information?

Thank you! --Abdull (talk) 19:40, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This talk page is for discussion of the article. If you have questions about the standard itself, you'd be better served reading some of the resources given in the article. Thanks! Woz2 (talk) 19:12, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merger Proposal

I propose IBIS Modelling be merged into this article. Woz2 (talk) 19:10, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done. There wasn't a lot to merge in. --Wtshymanski (talk) 18:59, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Element vs. component

Such models are referred to as physical models because the physical elements are being described. Using the definition of Electrical_element 'conceptual abstractions representing idealized electrical components', I would say there is no such thing as a physical element. I propose the above sentence be changed to "Such models are referred to as physical models because the physical components are being described." --SjoerdOptLand (talk) 13:16, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Being bold, I removed the whole thing because it was WP:OR in character. Woz2 (talk) 01:47, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What about Analog ICs?

Does IBIS support models and simulations of analog ICs like modulators? Please do add this info. into the entry. Axv4444 (talk) 13:05, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]