Talk:Institute for War and Peace Reporting

Human rights Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Organizations

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Journalism

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Politically motivated disinformation

The IWPR is most likely an organisation for politically motivated Disinformation. While I do not have clear evidence to prove this thesis, there are obvious signs that nothing related to this organisation is either scientific, journalistic, or trustworthy in any regard. Apparently, they are being used as a source in small, extremist magazines and web blogs in Germany, where I stumbled upon their Website over a year ago. The purpose is mostly publishing incorrect numbers for victims of violence and war and fake statements. I will be looking out for more examples, but they keep removing old links, while the e.g. wrong numbers from the articles are still being used as sources elsewhere.

I would suggest either clearly marking all sourcing related to the author within the article, or just simply removing all sources as they are not to be considered trustworthy. Especially when it comes to them claiming that people are part of their organisation that clearly aren't, sources should be checked and segments are removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:9E8:494B:D201:197F:7AD4:F892:C43B (talk) 18:10, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

financing ?? --145.254.203.80 19:52, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Institute for War and Peace Reporting. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140929022343/http://iwpr.net/programme/afghanistan/links to http://iwpr.net/programme/afghanistan/links

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:51, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]