Talk:International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Any independent confirmation that this organisation ever existed? It sounds suspiciously like the ICDISS whose existence is contested 194.129.60.10 17:09, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And the article was created by User:Liliana Dioguardi. I've added a hoax tag as an alert. JQ 21:32, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Edward Lucas from the Economist here. I think this does exist, quite clearly. look at www.iciss.ca

Unlike the ICDISS this has contact info etc. Seems to be part of Canadian foreign policy. 194.129.60.10 16:44, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Expansion Needed

The ICISS is a quite legitimate Canadian-championed commission, which had widespread global participation. It was created in direct response to Kofi Annan's challenge to prevent another Rwanda. It is notable for proposing a redefined notion of sovereignty and reorienting the humanitarian intervention debate on 'responsibility to protect'. This article could thus use expansion (although a lot of the "responsibility to protect" article is directly related!). hodgetts 03:45, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The ICISS website is reporting a bad hostname. Could it be replaced with http://responsibilitytoprotect.org/? Keller_Scholl 05:11, 03 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bias

The current version of this article shows a very strong bias against the Commission, which is not backed up with any sources. Can any action be taken on this? 129.125.176.90 (talk) 13:24, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Major Organization and Clean-up

The ICISS is a legitimate organization that provides facts and backing of UN Decisions. This articles needs to be cleaned and the pov needs to be removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.199.242.142 (talk) 14:10, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20070731161527/http://www.iciss-ciise.gc.ca/report2-en.asp to http://www.iciss-ciise.gc.ca/report2-en.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 21:28, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"just cause", is too small a quote, even if there is more to the part about Bush's decision

Without getting into a rant about Adam Smith's 'until all empires are destroyed' concept of using the methods of Imperialism, and other anti-american rants,

the section associating Bush's decision in iraq, with this seems incomplete if-true. "just cause" as a phrase, has been used by many different kinds of americans, over a long time, under or with many different kinds of claimed-authority or claims-of-justification.

Provide MORE DETAIL, or-remove. 120.21.167.200 (talk) 07:49, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]