Talk:Internet Systems Consortium

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

The 0-day market blurb from 10 Jan looks odd. Here's hoping for time to look into it. DanConnolly (talk) 18:14, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

The "0-day market" charge is an incorrect and inflammatory comment. I work at ISC, so I may be considered non-impartial, but I am also very familiar with the subject. ISC's Advance Security Notification service is a support service provided only to legitimate operators under an annual contract with an NDA and formal agreement. Although of course in some cases it is possible to discover an exploit given the patch, we give our support subscribers a patch, not an exploit. In contrast to the anonymous claim, ISC's security vulnerability policy was developed to help protect the Internet infrastructure and has been publicly disclosed for years. [1] & [2] Vickyrisk (talk) 13:01, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

ISC licence article[edit]

The orphan article ISC licence should be deleted or expanded or merged in here. Gronky 12:03, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

I expanded it a bit, and added a link to it from the BSD licenses article. I don't agree with deleting the ISC license article or merging it into this one, as they seem pretty distinct to me. Neilc 19:30, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

ISC's role on the internet[edit]

The article is missing what the ISC currently involves itself in. The ISC currently provides commercial dns resolutions to those that can afford to pay for it.

The ISC also employs or has members in a decision making capacity for which are sympathetic to corporate interest making them appear to have a bias and to be in a position of great power considering they maintain a root server and own bind.

I wanted to add a few things to the article since it has less information then most web hosting companies do.Woods01 (talk) 08:07, 13 December 2010 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Internet Systems Consortium. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

You may set the |checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting |needhelp= to your help request.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

If you are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:54, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

  1. ^
  2. ^