Talk:Internet in Russian

Messed definition and intro for politically-sensitive article[edit]

Ladies and gentlemen, I don't mind on either existence of the Russian-language Internet (of which I'm active user) or even it's unsourced definition. As long as we have a consistent intro. For now, the article's intro says that Russian-language Internet is often called "Runet". And than goes on to say that not all of "Runet" is in Russian. A little bit below, we read that "Not all the popular Russian-language sites are located in the domains of the CIS and in CIS in general". Furthermore, one can follow link to find out that "Runet" is either a Russian-language Internet or Internet in the Russian Federation. Oh, and there's a separate Yandex industrial definition of Runet) To make things even funnier, the text states that "82% of Ukrainian Internet was in Russian" - which obviously makes them the Russian one - not "Ukrainian")))

On a side note, I can't possibly imagine what the CIS political organization has to do with the Internet. According to the title, this article is about Russian language, not half-dead international organizations. Wishes, Ukrained2012 (talk) 17:13, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You say, that you are russian speaking... in russian article are MANY sources and information, why did not you look there?? A added some of them. Your adits looks like protesting and bordering on vandalism Dulamas (talk) 13:21, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's a strange question) I'm not interested in this article's scope and existence. And, as such, not obliged to develop and prove it's current politically-skewn claims. On the other hand, any user is ultimately entitled to protest, tag and delete every each information in Wikipedia as long as they follow the rules to it (which I hope I do). This article is scandalously-bad-written and sourced (and I legitimately did my best to point those issues out). Which is an additional proof of the fact that not many skillful Russia-concerned editors are interested in its mere survival.

As for your recent actions here, I would kindly ask you not to delete sensitive content-related tags without adequate changes to the text itself and necessary talk or edit summary explanations. I would also thank you for bringing up an underreliable obsolete source - if only you bothered to actually change the utterly bad text that you've referenced with it( Happy edits, Ukrained2012 (talk) 18:17, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It is not clear why the article has caused you such protest, there are sources, but you continue to put intensively the templates, (before sources) this is protest,(and vandalism) i can say, that if in this article would not be any information about Ukraina, you (as ukrainian) would not have so much protest and just did not pay attention to article, yea? Dulamas (talk) 20:05, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Generally, no. Well, since you've asked(?), are you negotiating particularly-angled censorship to the articles in exchange for me disregarding Wikipedia rules? See, your English is not really reaching to me so far( Wishes, Ukrained2012 (talk) 05:16, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]