From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
          This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject Computing (Rated Start-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject Systems (Rated C-class, High-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Systems, which collaborates on articles related to systems and systems science.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
 High  This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is within the field of Enterprise modelling.


I am responsible for the changes made yesterday, but wasn't signed in (still learning :)) I broadened the definition of IOP and showed two recent case of its' controversial application. --Daniel Spichtinger 7 July 2005 11:58 (UTC)

Interoperability vs. Interoperation[edit]

A distinction used within the Open Grid Forum is between interoperability and interoperation, with the former referring to creating a common fabric of interaction that everyone can connect to equally, and the latter being defined piecewise between particular systems (often through the creation of specific software adapters). It is our experience that it is far easier to do interoperation at first, but it is interoperability that builds a real commodity market with maximal benefits to customers. 13:27, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

hyperlinks are not relevant[edit]

I removed some hyperlinks because they are not relevant with the subject. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Aboujraf (talkcontribs) 14:36, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

The technical definition of interoperability need changed I believe... 'Interoperability is a property referring to the ability of diverse systems and organizations to work together (inter-operate)'. [in a manner as previously agree to or as each expect.] without adding this then the systems do not act as expected from each side and nothing is gained. Rikdrummond (talk) 15:01

File:Intellilink shows Interoperability Solutions.pdf Nominated for speedy Deletion[edit]

Image-x-generic.svg An image used in this article, File:Intellilink shows Interoperability Solutions.pdf, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 13:53, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

Errors in Article[edit]

In the Software section, the article erroneously cites ISO/IEC 2382-01 as relevant. That directive is superceded for information technology standards by ISO/IEC JTC 1 Directives. See section 1.1 (superceding and making interoperability mandatory). The relative definition is in Annex I: "interoperability is understood to be the ability of two or more IT systems to exchange information at one or more standardised interfaces and to make mutual use of the information that has been exchanged. An IT system is a set of IT resources providing services at one or more interfaces."
That definition is in close accord with competition law in the European Union governing software. Commission v. Microsoft, No. T‑167/08, European Community Court of First Instance (Grand Chamber Judgment of 17 September, 2007), para. 230, 374, 421, (rejecting Microsoft's argument that "interoperability" has a 1-way rather than 2-way meaning; information technology specifications must be disclosed with sufficient specificity to place competitors on an "equal footing" in regard to interoperability; "the 12th recital to Directive 91/250 defines interoperability as 'the ability to exchange information and mutually to use the information which has been exchanged'"). Marbux (talk) 18:26, 28 November 2012 (UTC)