Talk:Interstate TDR/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: wacky wace 08:20, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I will review the article, and will post any findings within the next few days. wacky wace 08:20, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

General

There are two dab links, Fairing and Naval Aviation Museum

Fixed. - The Bushranger _{Return fire}^{Flank speed} 16:37, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lead

Please use — for dashes, instead of using the ordinary dash sign.

Fixed. - The Bushranger _{Return fire}^{Flank speed} 16:37, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"...against the Japanese, but due to continued development problems, combined with conventional weapons proving to be adequate, the program was canceled." This middle bit is a bit awkward. I think this might be better: "The type saw some service in the Pacific Theater against the Japanese, but the program was canceled following continued development problems, and after conventional weapons proved to be adequate." Feel free to come up with another idea if you don't think that reads very well.

Went with a slightly different rewrite idea, hope it works? - The Bushranger _{Return fire}^{Flank speed} 16:37, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Even better! wacky wace 18:27, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Design and development

In the lead "assault drone" is in double quotes, in Design and development, it is in single quotes. Consistency here would maximise readability.

Fixed. - The Bushranger _{Return fire}^{Flank speed} 16:37, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Aircraft on display

It would be good to split the Florida link, so instead of "[[Pensacola, Florida]]", you would have "[[Pensacola, Florida|Pensacola]], [[Florida]]".

Fixed. - The Bushranger _{Return fire}^{Flank speed} 16:37, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Variants and operators

Just a quiery, but why are their spaces between the end of the lines and the references? I haven't seen it on any other aircraft articles, but if it is personal preference then I have no issues with it.

That was actually a slip on my part, it looks better without them, so I've fixed that. - The Bushranger _{Return fire}^{Flank speed} 16:37, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Overall, a very good article on a topic that (judging by the number of references) is poorly-covered elsewhere. Once the issues have been addressed, I will be happy to pass the article. Good work. wacky wace 08:56, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! - The Bushranger _{Return fire}^{Flank speed} 16:37, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

All issues have been addressed; I am happy to pass this article. wacky wace 18:27, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks! ^_^ - The Bushranger _{Return fire}^{Flank speed} 19:30, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]