Talk:Invasion of Guadeloupe (1810)/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
GA review of this version:
Pn = paragraph n • Sn = sentence n
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
b (MoS):
-
- I found two missing commas (for shame!) but have added them already.
-
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- No edit wars etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Another fine article, Jacky. Other than the most minor of issues (already changed), the article passes on first reading. Good job! — Bellhalla (talk) 12:21, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks very much!--Jackyd101 (talk) 18:47, 14 May 2009 (UTC)