Talk:Inventio

Writing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Writing, a WikiProject interested in improving Wikipedia's coverage of content related to the fields of rhetoric, composition, technical communication, literacy, and language studies.WritingWikipedia:WikiProject WritingTemplate:WikiProject WritingWriting articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Philosophy Low‑importance

	Philosophy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Latin Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latin, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Latin on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LatinWikipedia:WikiProject LatinTemplate:WikiProject LatinLatin articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

I'd like to see a links section for writing and speaking, in addition to the philosophy links section.

This is rubbish, complete with factual errors and cringe-worthy misrepresentations of basic concepts. It reads like some high school teacher's liberal apologetics for children who may have heard the grown ups use the phrase 'rhetoric' in a disparaging or disapproving way. The discussion of stasis misrepresents the entire method as some sort of disinterested or cooperative search for truth (or probably consensus lol), and the description of questions of jurisdiction is clearly fabricated by somebody who has no familiarity whatsoever with the primary sources (questions of jurisdiction relate to the venue - usually a court - in which a case is being heard: 'is this the right jurisdiction to hear this case? Should this be a civil or a criminal case?' etc). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.243.247.11 (talk) 15:30, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]