Talk:IoT forensics

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Article review[edit]

Very understandable article! Greetings :) Antonelse (talk) 12:57, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Article feedback[edit]

That's an interesting article, it's both well-referenced and reads nicely. Thanks!

If I may suggest some minor improvements:

It seems to me that "forensics" shouldn't be capitalised in the title and throughout the text in general
It would be nice to have somewhere in the lead that it means gathering evidence, if someone isn't sure what the word forensic means
You can see what pages link here at the page Special:WhatLinksHere/IoT_Forensics, and for now this is an orphan article. It would be nice to reference it in some places, maybe as a branch of digital forensics? MaarrkL (talk) 13:36, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

After 17 years of being a contributor to Wikipedia, it gives me immense pleasure to see my academic work cited in this article! --Ragib (talk) 09:15, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Ragib, thank you for your message. I would be very glad if you gave me your feedback on the page and I hope you can contribute to improve it. Thanks! Fpalmese (talk) 08:09, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Review[edit]

Good article !! Daniele leonzio (talk) 13:57, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]