Jump to content

Talk:Iperf

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Iperf. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:56, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

C vs. C++

[edit]

If you go to iperf.fr and look for source distributions, it appears to be C++, going all the way back to 1.7.0. (Somewhat of an annoyance that I bothered looking at this for my C embedded project where a C++ toolchain is not a realistic option...) https://iperf.fr/iperf-download.php#source Does anyone know if iperf was formerly C and was later changed to C++? I'll change it soon, but wanted to additionally know if there was any missing context. Chaparral2J (talk) 19:47, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"iperf" or "Iperf"?

[edit]

What is the name of it? "iperf" or "Iperf"?

It is currently inconsistent in the article.

--Mortense (talk) 13:04, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

According to the iperf3 website, it's "iperf3". But for iperf2 it's not that easy, as their website refers to itself as "Iperf2" and "iperf2" and sometimes even "iperf 2" or "Iperf 2". So, anything goes? ;-) -- Evilninja (talk) 14:18, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]