The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
This article should be merged with Irr-I galaxy and Irr-II galaxy. Since none of the other galaxies have been split into their Hubble sequence subtypes, and irregular galaxies are a less viewed subject, and that both Irr-I and Irr-II are substubs, and so is irregular galaxy, that there doesn't need to be three articles with no content. Just one article should do, this one, with some expansion. 188.8.131.52 20:18, 22 Sep 2004 (UTC)----
The above discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
No, peculiar galaxies are not always irregular galaxies, a merge would be incorrect. 184.108.40.206 (talk) 13:26, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
Agreed, my understanding is that there two separate entities. What *should* be done though is that both articles should be expanded in order to make this point more clear. Captmondo (talk) 17:32, 2 March 2009 (UTC)