Talk:Isfield

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sussex Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sussex, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sussex on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SussexWikipedia:WikiProject SussexTemplate:WikiProject SussexSussex-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

I don't see why my article should be deleted really, as it is a 'special' pub, for the fact that it is immediately adjacent to the Lavender Line, a page in Wikipedia.

Which article? But is it notable? -- RHaworth 09:46, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not exactly. I suppose it should be deleted.

Rewrite of article

I have rewritten this article in accordance with [1] the Wikipedia notes on writing about settlements. The notes are very useful for editors, since they lay out all the headings which might be used and thereby bring information to mind which might not otherwise occur: examples being education and churches; and, most importantly, sections specifically head history and geography.

A couple of comments on what was there:

the sweeping statement about Normans and others: I cannot find anything to back that up, although I've no doubt there is something somewhere. Whatever, the statement should have a reference
the tidal section of the Ouse finishes at Barcombe Mills (several Google searches confirm that); small boats were able to use the river no doubt. Peter Shearan (talk) 14:24, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Isfield. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080420113120/http://www.sussex-ouse.org.uk/river/index.htm to http://www.sussex-ouse.org.uk/river/index.htm
Added archive https://archive.is/20130126163510/http://www.isfield.com/ to http://www.isfield.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:15, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]