Jump to content

Talk:Isfield

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I don't see why my article should be deleted really, as it is a 'special' pub, for the fact that it is immediately adjacent to the Lavender Line, a page in Wikipedia.

Not exactly. I suppose it should be deleted.

Rewrite of article

[edit]

I have rewritten this article in accordance with [1] the Wikipedia notes on writing about settlements. The notes are very useful for editors, since they lay out all the headings which might be used and thereby bring information to mind which might not otherwise occur: examples being education and churches; and, most importantly, sections specifically head history and geography.

A couple of comments on what was there:

  • the sweeping statement about Normans and others: I cannot find anything to back that up, although I've no doubt there is something somewhere. Whatever, the statement should have a reference
  • the tidal section of the Ouse finishes at Barcombe Mills (several Google searches confirm that); small boats were able to use the river no doubt. Peter Shearan (talk) 14:24, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Isfield. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:15, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]