Talk:Israeli cuisine/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Pyrotec (talk) 23:07, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
- Starting review. Pyrotec (talk) 23:07, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
Initial comments
[edit]- I've done a quick couple of read throughs, yesterday and today, and at this stage of the review the article appears to be at or about GA standard: so far, its readable, well referenced, well illustrated and has a wide-ranging scope.
- I will now start the detailed review and this may take a couple of days, or so. I should also note that at this stage I will be mostly highlighting "problems", if any; so this stage might seem somewhat negative (but there again it might not). Pyrotec (talk) 09:54, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
Overall sumary
[edit]GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
Overall a Good Article, however the WP:Lead is rather "thin" and could do with some expansion. The main body of the article appears to be quite comprehensive.
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- B. MoS compliance:
- A. Prose quality:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
Congratulations on the quality of the article. I'm awarding the article GA-status, as it stands. The WP:Lead, however, would benefit from some attention. Pyrotec (talk) 08:41, 28 March 2010 (UTC)