Talk:Jamie Stuart/GA1
GA Review
[edit]GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
This article is in decent shape, but it needs more work before it becomes a Good Article.
- Is it well written?
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- In the Millwall section, add a comma after "suspension".
- Check. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 15:59, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
- In the Millwall section, add a comma after "suspension".
- B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
- Dates should be un-linked, per here. In the lead, it would be best if "Grays Athletic" and "Charlton Athletic" were linked once, per here. In the Millwall section, link "Millwall" just once. In the Bury section, link "Bury" just once. Same section, link "2002-2003" just once. In the Non-League career section, if any links are linked more than once, un-link them.
- Check. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 15:59, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
- Dates should be un-linked, per here. In the lead, it would be best if "Grays Athletic" and "Charlton Athletic" were linked once, per here. In the Millwall section, link "Millwall" just once. In the Bury section, link "Bury" just once. Same section, link "2002-2003" just once. In the Non-League career section, if any links are linked more than once, un-link them.
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):
- C. It contains no original research:
- D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- Is it neutral?
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- Is it stable?
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- If the statements above can be answered, I will pass the article. Good luck with improving this article!
- Pass or Fail:
-- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 22:43, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
- Added in the comma as per 1A and delinked the repitition and dates in 1B. Hope this is ok! --Jimbo[online] 23:15, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
- Thank you to Jimbo online for getting the stuff I left at the talk page, because I have gone off and placed the article as GA. Congrats. ;) -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 15:59, 19 September 2008 (UTC)