Talk:Jane Aitken/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) 07:20, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
Comments
- "with several Scottish families in 1771. " several compatriots in?
- Done
- Link Philadelphia.
- Done
- Link bookbinding.
- Done
- "She printed and bound about 400 volumes" repetitive, perhaps just follow on from the previous
sentence, like "and about 400 volumes..."
- Done
- "Christian Bible" is there another notable Bible other than the Christian one?
- Done
- Death inline references not needed in the infobox, they can go in the prose.
- Done
- Usually talk about her mother/father before her siblings.
- Done
- Link bookbinder again in the main body.
- Done
- "which she ran at North Third Street" what happened to the other place?
- Done
- "which is 500 feet " was, and convert.
- Done
- "Then in 1808 her " -> "The following year, ..."
- Done
- "from notes he had signed for" from notes for which he had signed. And what are these "notes"?
- Done
- "54,258" reduce that precision to nearest $1000.
- Done
- "known as Miss Jane Aitken.[1]" no need for italics.
- Done
- "than the actual printing" no need for "actual".
- Done
- "shows similarity to her binding work from 1802 to 1812 and shows that perhaps" shows shows... and this feels speculative. Who is making this connection, it's not Wikipedia.
- Done
- "She was advertising" She advertised.
- Done
- " friend of hers" friend of Aitken
- Done
- "equipment was sold off" no need for "off".
- Done
- "20 miles " convert.
- Done
- Works - convert this to a gallery like I did in one of your other articles and utilise the caption option instead of "Some of her other works were -"...
- Done
- "of the Christian Bible" okay so maybe there are other notable Bibles! But you link that here, but not in the lead.
- Done
- "most important book she produced during" which "she"?
- Done
- "Other early businesswomen in contention" not sure this is really relevant to the article.
- Done
- "1820-1900" endash.
- Done
- That's all I have for today. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 11:43, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks for review. I'll get started on it.--Doug Coldwell (talk) 12:43, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
- @The Rambling Man: All issues have been addressed. Can you take another loook. Thanks.--Doug Coldwell (talk) 18:58, 17 September 2021 (UTC)