Talk:Jews/GA1

GA Reassessment

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
This article fails #2 of the good article criteria. Much of it is unreferenced, including most of the "Jews and Judaism" section, "Etymology" section, the second paragraph of the "Who is a Jew?" section, much of the "Ethnic divisions", the "Population" section, and most after that. In fact the article is hardly referenced at all.--Patton^t/c 21:08, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

We'll be adding more references to the article. For an article of this size, it's going to take a little while, so please be patient. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz (talk · contribs) 19:28, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ok I will wait and see, thanks.--Patton^t/c 19:59, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A source has been added for just about everything in the article. In most instances, if a sentence doesn't have a footnote, the next footnote in that paragraph covers it. Please let me know if you see any problems. Thank you for your patience. — Malik Shabazz (talk · contribs) 07:58, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copied from User talk:Patton123

Hi. I was wondering when you think you'll have the time to finish your GA reassessment of Jew. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz (talk · contribs) 22:54, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The GAR has been archived so I reckon we just leave it. You've done a great job referencecing. Thanks! I no longer think it should be demoted.--Patton^t/c 23:14, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]